ano ang kaugnayan ng Annotations of Jose Rizal sa libro ni Morgan sa ating kasalukayang panahon
1. ano ang kaugnayan ng Annotations of Jose Rizal sa libro ni Morgan sa ating kasalukayang panahon
Answer:
Ang Anotasyons sa Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas at si Jose Rizal Taong 1890 nang inilabas ni Jose Rizal ang anotasyons sa libro ni Antonio de Morga.
2. When Rizal did annotate the Morga’s Sucesos?
Answer:
1890
Explanation:
Rizal published his annotation of Antonia de Morga's Sucesos in 1890.
Answer:
1890
Step-by-step explanation:
3. 5 annotation of rizal
1.
Morga: The first island conquered and colonized by the Spaniards was Sebu.
Rizal: Sugbú, in the dialect of the country.
2.
Morga: a strip of colored cloth wrapped about the waist, and passed between the legs, so that it covered the privy parts, reaching half-way down the thigh; these are called bahaques.
Rizal: bahag "a richly dyed cloth, generally edged with gold" among the chiefs.
3.
Morga: Winter and summer for the rains generally last in all these islands from the month of June until the month of September. The summer lasts from October to the end of May, with clear skies and fair winds at sea
Rizal: Morga considers the rainy season as winter, and the rest of the year as summer. However this is not very exact, for at Manila, in December, January, and February, thermometer is lower months of August and September.
4.
Rizal: Phlippines was NOT DESERTED and was actually HABITABLE
Morga: Philippines was DESERTED and INHABITABLE.
5.
Rizal: Spaniards, like any other nation, treat food to which they are not accustomed or is unknown to them with disgust. This fish that Morga mentions is bagoong (saited & fermented fish).
Morga: Beef and fish they know it best when it has started to rot and stink
4. what is the content of rizal annotation
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Answer:
Annotating Colonial Histories: José Rizal and The Rethinking of Filipino Identity in 19th Century England
Explanation:
5. What is Rizal's Motive in writinghis annotation of Morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
i hope it helps
6. It refers to the key skill that is constantly practices in writing a summary and annotated bibliography.
Answer:
p*tang *na si optimum pride urgh argh argh argh
7. 250 words reflection about rizal's and morgan's views
Answer:
Tanung mo sa pagong
Explanation:
ok
8. What are the lives of the early Filipinos based on the view of Morgan and Jose Rizal
Answer:
Aware of most of the books written about the Philippines, he selected the Sucesos because he "considered it necessary to invoke the testimony of an illustrous Spaniard who governed the destinies of the Philippines in the beginning of her new era and witnessed the last moments of our ancient nationality."
Explanation:
Hope it helps.
#CarryOnLearning
#YouCanDoIt
#NeverGiveUp
9. why did Rizal annotate the book of Morga's
Explanation:
because the book narrates the history of wars,intrigues, diplomacy and evangelization of the Philippines
10. Do you agree with Blumentrits critismbof Rizal's annotation?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
they will and always will to happen
11. Compare and contrast morga writings and rizal annotations
Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on this book offer different perspectives on the history of the Philippines. Here are some ways in which they can be compared and contrasted:
Authorship: Morga wrote the original book, while Rizal provided annotations and commentary on it. Morga was a Spanish historian and colonial official who lived in the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal was a Filipino nationalist and writer who lived in the 19th century.
Historical context: Morga's book was written during the early period of Spanish colonization in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations were written during the later period of Spanish rule when nationalist sentiments were growing.
Focus: Morga's book is a historical account of the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal's annotations focus on correcting inaccuracies and biases in Morga's account and highlighting the contributions of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
Language: Morga wrote his book in Spanish, the language of the colonizers, while Rizal's annotations were written in Spanish and Tagalog, the language of the colonized.
Perspective: Morga's account is written from the perspective of a Spanish colonizer, while Rizal's annotations provide a counter-narrative from the perspective of a Filipino nationalist.
Purpose: Morga's book was intended to justify Spanish colonization and portray it as a civilizing mission, while Rizal's annotations sought to challenge this narrative and assert the value of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
In summary, while Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on it both deal with Philippine history, they have different authorship, focus, perspective, and purpose, reflecting the changes in the colonial and nationalist contexts in which they were written.
12. what are the aims of rizal in writing the annotation of Morga's book?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.#carryonlearning13. what is Rizal’s motive in writing his annotations of morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
14. what is a rizal annotation of morga's sucesoa
Answer:
he selected the Sucesos because he "considered it necessary to invoke the testimony of an illustrous Spaniard who governed the destinies of the Philippines in the beginning of her new era and witnessed the last moments of our ancient nationality
15. What are the two catogories of Rizal’s annotation?
Answer:
These are two categories in Rizal's annotation
1. Rizal corrects the original one. “The straight forward historical annotations” 2. “Historical based reflect his anticlerical bias” a high-ranking colonial official in the Philippines, New Spain and Peru.
16. Compare and contrast rizal and morga's annotation
Answer:
(contrast)
Rizal and Morga’s different views about the Filipinos and the Philippine culture. rizal and morga view of pre-colonial filipino culture.
(Compare Rizal)
A ComparisonJose Rizal lamented that he was born and bred withut knowing our colonial past.
(Compare morga)
Morga was obviously fascinated with the social organization of the natives; he described origins, differences, privileges of social classes, upward and downward mobility, inheritance of possessions and titles.
17. how annotations and summary help in critical reading?Pahelp lang po
Answer:
Features on the genome derived through the transformation of raw genomic sequences into information by integerating computational tools, auxiliary biological data, and biological knowledge . yan na po
Explanation:sana po makatlong
18. Explain why Rizal decided to make an annotation for Morga’s book?
Answer:
Because He had been rethinking the idea of the Filipino not as a people who were equal to their Spanish colonizers but a people with a unique civilization that was destroyed by colonization. Rizal found the answer to his idea in Morga's book and it was this work that he decided to reprint with his annotations.
19. Sucesos de las islas filipinas rizal annotation
Answer:
sorry whatt i dont understand
20. Rizals annotation of sucesos de las filipinas
Answer:
Canyo give me a picture of that
21. Make a comparison of Morga’s book and Rizal’s annotation
Answer:
thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx
22. compare and contrast morga's writings and Rizal annotation
Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations have similarities and differences in terms of their historical context, style of writing, and purpose.
Morga's writings, particularly the "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas," were written during the 16th century, during the Spanish colonial period in the Philippines. It was written in the form of a historical account of the Philippines during the early colonial period. Morga's writing style was straightforward, factual, and aimed to provide an accurate account of the events that transpired during that time. The primary purpose of Morga's writing was to document the history of the Philippines during the early colonial period and to serve as a reference for future generations.
Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, were written in the late 19th century, during the Philippine Revolution against Spanish colonial rule. Rizal's annotations were made on Morga's "Sucesos," which he deemed as an accurate source of Philippine history. Rizal's writing style was more poetic and reflective, as he inserted his own thoughts and opinions on the events described in Morga's writings. The purpose of Rizal's annotations was to use Morga's "Sucesos" as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride, and to educate them about their rich pre-colonial history.
In terms of content, Morga's writings primarily focused on the Spanish conquest of the Philippines, the establishment of Spanish rule, and the conversion of the Filipinos to Christianity. It also included descriptions of the customs and traditions of the Filipinos during that time. Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, emphasized the importance of the pre-colonial history of the Philippines, including the achievements of the early Filipinos before the arrival of the Spaniards.
In summary, while both Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations are historical accounts of the Philippines, they differ in terms of their historical context, writing style, and purpose. Morga's writings aimed to provide an accurate account of the early colonial period in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations used Morga's work as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride.
23. similarities and differences of jose rizal and Antonio morga's annotation
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
24. Rizal and morga jose rizal's annotations to morga's sucesos delas islas filipinas
Answer:
Rizal's friend and indefatigable pen pal, Prof. Ferdinand Blumentritt, once suggested that he write a Philippine history book, but Rizal felt he neither had the time nor the energy, much less a wide knowledge of our past, so the next best thing was to annotate Morga's Sucesos.
Explanation:
sna maka tulong
25. compare and contrast morgan and rizal view in philippine history and culture?
Explanation:
i hope it helps
mark me as brainlest can you
26. What motivate rizal's to annotate morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
27. compare view of morgan and rizal in philippine history and culture
Answer:
Rizal and Morga’s View of the Philippine History: A Comparison
CT
Explanation:
28. how annotation and summary help in critical writing?
Answer:
Features on the genome derived through the transformation of raw genomic sequences into information by integerating computational tools, auxiliary biological data, and biological knowledge
Explanation:
Answer:
Critical to the gym and then I will be able to get a hold of the guy who was there a reason why you are not going to be able to make it to the meeting tonight
29. What are the differences and similarities between Morga's Sucesos and Rizal's Annotation.
Answer:
Rizal comments that the Philippines of his time was no better than the pre- Hispanic Philippines. ... Rizal used history as a propaganda weapon. It was deemed too much propaganda for historians and too historical for propagandists.
30. Annotation of rizal and morga in economics
Answer:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
