What motivate rizal's to annotate morga's work?
1. What motivate rizal's to annotate morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
2. What is Rizal's Motive in writinghis annotation of Morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
i hope it helps
3. what is Rizal’s motive in writing his annotations of morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
4. what is the main reason why Jose Rizal annotated Antonio De morga's work?
Answer:
novels or his polemical tracts, but in a scholarly work - his annotated réédition of Morga' s Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas . Aside from the ra-.
Explanation:
hope its help
5. what do you think is the greatest contribution of rizal annotation to morgas book to philippine history?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Hope it helps,6. what is a rizal annotation of morga's sucesoa
Answer:
he selected the Sucesos because he "considered it necessary to invoke the testimony of an illustrous Spaniard who governed the destinies of the Philippines in the beginning of her new era and witnessed the last moments of our ancient nationality
7. Annotation of rizal and morga in economics
Answer:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
8. 1. Why were Rizal’s annotations of Morga’s book significant to Filipinos? Essay 3 Paragraph
Answer:
Rizal emphasizes that Morga was the evidence and the primary source of history in the Philippines. Rizal's argued that Filipinos before has their own culture, and did not require a new religion or “civilization” from Spain.
The Morga annotations provided the seeds of the idea of how the Filipinos should view themselves amidst a growing nationalism that eventually led to the formation of a nation.
Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity
Explanation:
hope it help
9. ofWhat is the motivationqRizal in annotating the wordMorga? How does his works benepits the aims ofthe otherpropagadish who are working for reforms during this time?
of course
Explanation:
sorry for the late reply
10. thoughts about rizal's annotation of antonio morga's sucesos de las islas filipinas
Explanation:
is that even a question?
11. In general, what is Rizal's motive in writing his annotations of Morga's work? How does this fit into the aims of other propagandists working for reforms during this time?
Answer:
“As a child José Rizal heard from his uncle, José Alberto, about an ancient history of the Philippines written by a Spaniard named Antonio de Morga. The knowledge of this book came from the English Governor of Hong Kong, Sir John Browning, who had once paid his uncle a visit. While in London, Rizal immediately acquainted himself with the British Museum where he found one of the few remaining copies of that work. At his own expense, he had the work republished with annotations that showed the Philippines was an advanced civilization prior to the Spanish conquest. Austin Craig, an early biographer of Rizal, translated into English some of the more important of these annotations
Explanation:
sana makatulong!!
12. Are Rizal's annotation on Morga valid based on current historical works as presented in Scoot's Barangay".
Rizal's annotation on Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events in the Philippine Islands) was based on his extensive research and critical analysis of the Spanish colonial experience in the Philippines. Rizal's annotations aimed to correct the biased and distorted accounts about Philippine history and culture that were propagated by the Spanish colonizers.
Scott's book, "Barangay: Sixteenth-Century Philippine Culture and Society," provides a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of pre-colonial Philippine society and culture. However, Scott acknowledges Rizal's contribution in shedding light on the Spanish colonization and its negative impact on Philippine culture and identity.
Overall, Rizal's annotations on Morga's work still carry historical validity and remain significant in understanding the Philippine colonial experience. However, Rizal's views were also based on his own biases and perspectives, and should be read in conjunction with other historical sources and works for a more comprehensive understanding of Philippine history and culture.
13. what are the aims of rizal in writing the annotation of Morga's book?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.#carryonlearning14. Why Rizal choose to annotate to work of morga in own opinion. Subject. the Life and Dr. Jose Rizal
Answer:
He choose to annotate Morga's work because he had been rethinking the idea of the Filipino not as a people who were equal to their Spanish colonizers but a people with a unique civilization that was destroyed by colonization. Rizal found the answer to his idea in Morga's book and it was this work that he decided to reprint with his annotation. This lecture will discuss how Jose Rizal rewrote the Philippine history of his time with what has now been considered as his second major work. The Morga annotations provided the seeds of the idea of how the Filipinos should view themselves amidst a growing nationalism that eventually led to the formation of a nation.
sana nakatulong :)
15. Why did Rizal's annotated the book of Antonio de Morga when he was in london?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.Sep 1, 1999
Answer:
The discovery of Morga’s Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas proved to be serendipitous to Rizal. He had been rethinking the idea of the Filipino not as a people who were equal to their Spanish colonizers but a people with a unique civilization that was destroyed by colonization. Rizal found the answer to his idea in Morga’s book and it was this work that he decided to reprint with his annotations.
16. similarities and differences of jose rizal and Antonio morga's annotation
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
17. Compare and contrast morga writings and rizal annotations
Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on this book offer different perspectives on the history of the Philippines. Here are some ways in which they can be compared and contrasted:
Authorship: Morga wrote the original book, while Rizal provided annotations and commentary on it. Morga was a Spanish historian and colonial official who lived in the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal was a Filipino nationalist and writer who lived in the 19th century.
Historical context: Morga's book was written during the early period of Spanish colonization in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations were written during the later period of Spanish rule when nationalist sentiments were growing.
Focus: Morga's book is a historical account of the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal's annotations focus on correcting inaccuracies and biases in Morga's account and highlighting the contributions of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
Language: Morga wrote his book in Spanish, the language of the colonizers, while Rizal's annotations were written in Spanish and Tagalog, the language of the colonized.
Perspective: Morga's account is written from the perspective of a Spanish colonizer, while Rizal's annotations provide a counter-narrative from the perspective of a Filipino nationalist.
Purpose: Morga's book was intended to justify Spanish colonization and portray it as a civilizing mission, while Rizal's annotations sought to challenge this narrative and assert the value of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
In summary, while Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on it both deal with Philippine history, they have different authorship, focus, perspective, and purpose, reflecting the changes in the colonial and nationalist contexts in which they were written.
18. What are the differences and similarities between Morga's Sucesos and Rizal's Annotation.
Answer:
Rizal comments that the Philippines of his time was no better than the pre- Hispanic Philippines. ... Rizal used history as a propaganda weapon. It was deemed too much propaganda for historians and too historical for propagandists.
19. Compare and contrast rizal and morga's annotation
Answer:
(contrast)
Rizal and Morga’s different views about the Filipinos and the Philippine culture. rizal and morga view of pre-colonial filipino culture.
(Compare Rizal)
A ComparisonJose Rizal lamented that he was born and bred withut knowing our colonial past.
(Compare morga)
Morga was obviously fascinated with the social organization of the natives; he described origins, differences, privileges of social classes, upward and downward mobility, inheritance of possessions and titles.
20. Rizal and morga jose rizal's annotations to morga's sucesos delas islas filipinas
Answer:
Rizal's friend and indefatigable pen pal, Prof. Ferdinand Blumentritt, once suggested that he write a Philippine history book, but Rizal felt he neither had the time nor the energy, much less a wide knowledge of our past, so the next best thing was to annotate Morga's Sucesos.
Explanation:
sna maka tulong
21. Why did Jose Rizal annotate the book of Antonio de Morga?
Answer:
Rizal felt he neither had the time nor the energy, much less a wide knowledge of our past.
Explanation:
Rizal's friend and indefatigable pen pal, Prof. Ferdinand Blumentritt, once suggested that he write a Philippine history book, but Rizal felt he neither had the time nor the energy, much less a wide knowledge of our past, so the next best thing was to annotate Morga's Sucesos.22. Relevancy of the annotation of jose rizal in morga's book in our present times?.
Answer:
magbasa po sa history ni jose rizal
Explanation:
mag aral ng mabuti upang buhay ay bumuti
23. Synopsis Of Rizal's Annotation of success de las Islas Filipinas by Antonio Morga
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
thank God I understand Spanish
I'm from china I'm learning
some Philippine history..
Answer:
Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
Hope it helps po
24. compare and contrast morga's writings and Rizal annotation
Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations have similarities and differences in terms of their historical context, style of writing, and purpose.
Morga's writings, particularly the "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas," were written during the 16th century, during the Spanish colonial period in the Philippines. It was written in the form of a historical account of the Philippines during the early colonial period. Morga's writing style was straightforward, factual, and aimed to provide an accurate account of the events that transpired during that time. The primary purpose of Morga's writing was to document the history of the Philippines during the early colonial period and to serve as a reference for future generations.
Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, were written in the late 19th century, during the Philippine Revolution against Spanish colonial rule. Rizal's annotations were made on Morga's "Sucesos," which he deemed as an accurate source of Philippine history. Rizal's writing style was more poetic and reflective, as he inserted his own thoughts and opinions on the events described in Morga's writings. The purpose of Rizal's annotations was to use Morga's "Sucesos" as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride, and to educate them about their rich pre-colonial history.
In terms of content, Morga's writings primarily focused on the Spanish conquest of the Philippines, the establishment of Spanish rule, and the conversion of the Filipinos to Christianity. It also included descriptions of the customs and traditions of the Filipinos during that time. Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, emphasized the importance of the pre-colonial history of the Philippines, including the achievements of the early Filipinos before the arrival of the Spaniards.
In summary, while both Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations are historical accounts of the Philippines, they differ in terms of their historical context, writing style, and purpose. Morga's writings aimed to provide an accurate account of the early colonial period in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations used Morga's work as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride.
25. Explain why Rizal decided to make an annotation for Morga’s book?
Answer:
Because He had been rethinking the idea of the Filipino not as a people who were equal to their Spanish colonizers but a people with a unique civilization that was destroyed by colonization. Rizal found the answer to his idea in Morga's book and it was this work that he decided to reprint with his annotations.
26. Why were Rizals annotation of morgas book significant to Filipinos?
Explanation:
The Morga annotations provided the seeds of the idea of how the Filipinos should view themselves amidst a growing nationalism that eventually led to the formation of a nation.
Answer:
Because the morga annotations provided the seeds of the idea of how Filipinos should view themselves amidst a growing nationalism that eventually led to the formation of a nation.
27. In general, what is Rizal's motive in writing his annotation of Morga's work? Howdoes this fit into the aims of other propagandists working for reforms during this time?
Answer:
He says it could have developed on its own into something great. According to Rizal, Filipinos has a system of writing, an advanced ... Rizal used history as a propaganda weapon.
28. Make a comparison of Morga’s book and Rizal’s annotation
Answer:
thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx
29. do you think rizal aim in annotating morga's sucesos is achieved
Answer:
yes
yan lang alam ko :(
torre
30. why did Rizal annotate the book of Morga's
Explanation:
because the book narrates the history of wars,intrigues, diplomacy and evangelization of the Philippines
